Dec 082011

A few months ago, Neil and I created a 2-minute film for the World WildLife Fund (WWF) Video Competition. This competition, launched as part of WWF’s 50th anniversary celebrations, asked filmmakers to produce original short films on the theme of: “Life. Nature. You. Make the Connection”. There were over 260 submissions to the competition, but in the end there could only be 2 winners, one by popular vote and one by jury vote. Surprisingly, WE WON! Check out our award winning film below:

We are thrilled to announce that our film, the Runner, was one of the two Winners! Our film won the Jury prize and Myles Thompson won the popular vote with his film “Life, nature, you.” Check out Myles’ video below.

On top of a $10,000 film commission, another part of the prize was an all-expenses covered trip to New Delhi, India to attend the actual film festival. Neil and I couldn’t make it due to our responsibilities at our Universities, but we did produce a little award-acceptance video that they played at the festival. Check the video below.

We’re really grateful to the WWF for running the competition and can’t wait to work on our next film project with them.

Last week, Indiana University hosted the joint meeting of the Animal Behavior Society and the National Ethological Conference. One of the events at this scientific conference was the 27th annual Animal Behavior Film Festival. One of our films, Battle of the Sexes, took first place in the non-commercial film category!

Battle of the Sexes highlights some my dissertation research, in which I investigate how the sexes deal with conflict that occur as a result of the sexes sharing most of the same genes while often dealing with vastly different selective pressures. I investigated this in the Ibiza Wall Lizard, Podarcis pityusensis. Check out the award-winning film below!

Battle of the Sexes from Day's Edge Productions on Vimeo.

WINNER of the 2011 Animal Behavior Society Film Festival (Non-commercial division).

A short film about Nate Dappen’s research on how males and females coevolve together. Nate is working on his PhD in evolutionary biology at the University of Miami, Florida. He studies sexual coevolution and color evolution in the Ibiza wall lizard (Podarcis pityusensis).

Film by: Nate Dappen & Neil Losin. Additional photography by Joris van Alphen. Narrated by John Astbury. See credits for music.

To learn more, visit daysedgeproductions.com/

Field Season 2011: Part 1

Posted by Nate Dappen at 6:23 pm on July 28, 2011
Jul 282011

A view from one of our field sites on Formentera. It's a hard job, but someone has to do it.

My field season – perhaps my last as a graduate student – ended almost two months ago. Most people who follow Day’s Edge know that I study color evolution in an endemic lizard species found on the charming Spanish Mediterranean island of Formentera. Honestly, it all went by in a flash. Seems like yesterday that I was online and disapproving of Google’s annual April Fools hoaxes. Over the last three years, I spent about ten months in the islands conducting my PhD research and enjoying island life. I posted info about some of our results from 2010 here. Also, I posted a little description of Formentera last year. You can check that out here.

This year, I spent April, May and the first week of June on Formentera. I had three main goals to accomplish: I wanted to 1) set up a breeding experiment to investigate the heritable basis of color; 2) test whether intrasexual ontogenetic conflict over color expression was occurring (i.e. are the costs and benefits of expressing color different between juveniles and adults of the same sex); and 3) investigate what might cause divergent color evolution among populations and determine whether those color difference resulted in any degree of reproductive isolation (i.e. will lizards from a blue population recognize lizards from a brown population as mates or competitors?). Needless to say, these were ambitions goals for only two months of work. Luckily, I didn’t have to do all the work alone. I brought four University of Miami undergraduates with me as field assistants. It’s amazing what you can accomplish with a team!

Field assistants from right to left: Marina Knize, Ryan McMinds & Hannah Peck. Missing from this photo is Jeremy Upsal.

The breeding experiment failed miserably. Here’s a Field Vision video about my set up. Watching it now, I’m not surprised it didn’t work. Lizards kept escaping and breeding pairs seemed to hate each other. In total, I only collected four eggs—not nearly enough to estimate heritability. Additionally, I didn’t have the time or money to stay until those eggs hatched, much less rear them until adulthood. So, ixnay on the breeding experiment. It was a full-fledged failure. That’s OK. Research doesn’t always go as planned, which is why its important or researchers to be flexible.

Birds Eye view of a diverse habitat. Open habitat (brown and grays) is interspersed with patches of vegetation

Bird's eye view of a diverse habitat. Open habitat (brown and grays) is interspersed with patches of vegetation

On to project number two: figuring out whether color was under intrasexual ontogenetic conflict. In 2010 I noticed something interesting: in areas were there was patchy vegetation interspersed with open habitat, I kept seeing juveniles out in the open—tons of them. Adults, on the other hand, seemed to stay closer to vegetation. At first, I ignored this observation. But after visiting a few new islands, I also noticed that the juveniles of some islands were more colorful than juveniles of other islands. And it wasn’t simply that juvenile color was correlated with adult color from the same population. On a few islands, juveniles looked very much like their adult counterparts, while on others they were much less colorful than the adults.

Adult male lizard has killed and proceeds to eat this juvenile

The next thing I know, I see six cannibalism events in the span of a few weeks (to see a video of these lizards cannibalizing juveniles watch our 3-minute video Cold-Blooded Cannibals). And suddenly, I had a new hypothesis. Maybe vegetative patches are these lizards’ favorite habitats. This makes sense. There’s more food in these areas and there’s less risk of getting attacked by a bird when a lizard is in the bushes. But these patches are limited – there are only so many of them and in each patch there’s only enough room for so many lizards. Adult lizards fight amongst themselves for the best patches. The biggest, baddest males end up in their favorite bushes therefore excluding losers to marginal habitat. Juveniles can’t possibly compete with adults for these resources – especially since these little guys need to be careful not to get eaten! So, they abandon the vegetation for open areas until they are big enough to compete. But now these juveniles are out in the open, where they are vulnerable to other predators like birds. The price of being colorful in the open is much higher than it is for residents in the vegetation. Therefore, there should be strong selection on juveniles to be less colorful. The problem is that adult males use conspicuous color to advertise their fighting ability. In sum, being colorful is bad for juveniles because it makes them more conspicuous to other lizards (who eat them) and more vulnerable to detection by avian predators (more vulnerable than adults because juveniles are forced in to marginal open habitats). But being colorful is good for adult males, because it helps them win fights, which allows them access to more resources.

I think that color expression is under conflict among age groups. If colorful adult males sire colorful juveniles, the juveniles will be at a disadvantage. If less colorful males give birth to less colorful lizards, they may fare well as juveniles, but as adults, they aren’t going to win very many fights. Because color expression is probably controlled by many of the same genes in both juveniles and adults, its tough for lizards be successful in both these stages of development (hence ontogenetic conflict).

Color increases in saturation and coverage area as Ibiza wall lizards increase in size, both in males and females. The degree of this change, however, varies among populations.

Natural selection is a pretty amazing process. Generations of selection on hormonal responses (which play a prime role in the expression of color genes) have likely resulted in juveniles that are much less colorful than adults. But the fact that in some populations juveniles are still colorful suggests that there are some populations where this conflict has not been fully resolved. Wow. That was a long explanation.

I tested this hypothesis with four simple experiments. First, I did a survey to find out if there really were more juveniles in patches than vegetation by putting pitfall traps in vegetation of open habitats and seeing what we’d catch. Second, we performed a clay model predation experiment, making hundreds of clay lizard models, putting them in vegetation and open areas and looking at where they were attacked most and by what types of predators (you can see these experiments in action by watching Field Visions II and III). Third, we collected juveniles and inspected them for scars that came from being attacked by other lizards (see Field Vision V). And finally, we tethered juveniles to a fishing pole and introduced them to adult lizards to see whether the adults would try and eat them (again, if you want to watch some lizard cannibalism, check out Cold-Blooded Cannibals).

A juvenile that we collected with two large scars from being attacked by an adult lizard.

Unlike the breeding experiment, everything work out just as I expected. We found more juveniles in open areas and more adults in vegetation. In the predation experiment, lizard models were attacked more by birds in open areas and by lizards in vegetated areas. In both areas, colorful models were attacked more than cryptic models. Out of 15 juveniles that we caught, all but one of them was covered in scars from lizard attacks and almost every adult lizard, male and female, immediately attacked tethered juveniles as if they were food items. It doesn’t get cleaner than that, folks.  The only data missing (data that I will probably never collect) to show that color is under intrasexual ontogenetic conflict, is data showing that colorful adults actually sire offspring that are more colorful than less colorful adults. For now, this is just something that I assume happens.

This post is already WAY longer than I planned, so I’m going to stop here and tell you about my final experiment in a few days.

One last note: this week was the annual Animal Behavior conference. They have a film festival at this conference. This year, Neil and I had three videos in the festival –Who’s your Neighbor, Battle of the Sexes, and Alpha Male. Who’s your Neighbor and Alpha Male can be seen on our Days Edge site and Battle of the Sexes should be up there by tomorrow. We don’t know yet how our films fared, but if you get a chance, they are worth checking out.

Field Vision - Entry 5: Cannibalism and Joris

Posted by Nate Dappen at 5:01 pm on May 13, 2011
May 132011

Field Vision – Entry 5: Life as a biologist from Nathan Dappen on Vimeo.

In this segment of “Field Vision” my friend Joris van Alphen www.jorisvanalphen.com), another biologist and phenomenal photographer, helps me catch juvenile lizards to find out how often adults are attacking juveniles.

No rest for the weary

Posted by Neil Losin at 7:09 pm on September 22, 2010
Sep 222010

Eastern Tailed Blue (Cupido comyntas) covered in dew before sunrise

I spent a very enjoyable week at home in Virginia visiting my family. (I also spent a beautiful morning photographing butterflies at Wakefield Park in Fairfax County, VA, and I’m including a few pictures here.) As I write this, I’m on a plane from Washington, DC to Los Angeles. Tonight, I’m getting on another plane to Sydney, Australia. From Sydney, I’ll get on another plane to cross the continent, finishing in Perth, Western Australia, two days after I left Washington!

Common Buckeye (Junonia coenia) basking in the morning sun

I’m presenting some of my research on Dendrobates pumilio at the ISBE (International Society for Behavioral Ecology) meeting in Perth. Before the meeting starts, Alex Kirschel and I will do some birding around Perth, and after the meeting, Nate Dappen and I will explore southwestern Australia for a few days.

Upon my return to LA, I have a couple of days to prepare myself for a Scientific Filmmaking workshop at Bodega Marine Laboratory in northern California, and I’ll finally be home in mid-October. I’ll try to update the blog between now and then, but I can’t make any promises!

Finally! A neillosin.com update!

Posted by Neil Losin at 8:29 am on July 26, 2010
Jul 262010

A small Southern Pacific Rattlesnake (Crotalus oreganus helleri) rests on a cool morning in the Santa Monica Mountains. This is the latest image (taken July 2010) to be added to neillosin.com.

As I mentioned in a previous post, I’ve been working on updating my main photo website, www.neillosin.com. The last time I updated the site was when I added photographs taken in Uganda in February 2009. Not surprisingly, there were a lot of new pictures to be added this time — over 200, in fact, representing more than 50 new species for my collection. We (I say “we” because my awesome dad helps me maintain the site) also made some aesthetic updates and — I think — made the site a little more attractive and easier to navigate. To see the whole batch of newly-added images, follow this link and click the “recently added” button. And please let me know what you think about the new look!

Just a couple of quick updates re: previous blog posts. On May 13, I wrote about the America’s Birdiest County competition. At that time, we knew that LA County birders had tallied a massive 271 species in one weekend, which would surely put us in contention for the title “America’s Birdiest County.” The official results are in and, for the fifth year in a row, Los Angeles County won! Nueces County, TX, and San Diego County, CA also came up with some great numbers – 262 and 256, respectively. Just north of LA County, the birders of Kern County repeated their title as “America’s Birdiest Inland County” with 242 species, an amazing total for a county without any coastline!

A male brown anole (Anolis sagrei) with a regenerated tail. Notice how the color and pattern changes abruptly where the original tail broke off.

On April 29, I wrote about two-tailed lizards, and Nate Dappen followed with a similar post on June 12. After my original post, I observed dozens of lizards with their tails in all stages of regeneration, including a few more two-tailed individuals. Just before I left Miami, I made some measurements to determine the rate of tail regrowth on one individual I knew quite well. There was a male brown anole in our backyard that was always perched on the same small tree, vigorously defending its territory against all other males. On May 1 or thereabouts, I noticed that the male had lost most of its tail. This date corresponds quite nicely with the arrival of my Boston Terrier, Hugo, in Miami… but Hugo shall remain innocent until proven otherwise! Over the next several weeks, I watched as the male anole’s tail gradually regrew, and I decided to measure the new growth before I left town. I found that the tail had regrown a startling 44mm in 56 days, a rate of 5.5mm per week, or nearly a millimeter a day!

Jun 152010

I had the pleasure of spending Monday morning photographing with Judd Patterson at Matheson Hammock Park in South Miami. I’ve admired Judd’s photography for several years, but I hadn’t met him in person until the Biscayne National Park BioBlitz last month. Judd is a really nice person, and a terrific photographer too. In the words of a mutual friend (who shall remain anonymous), Judd’s images “make the rest of us look stupid.” Alas, I tend to agree! You should check out Judd’s photos at his personal website, as well as Birds In Focus, a kind of mini-stock-agency that he runs with fellow bird photographers Bob Gress and David Seibel.

A Chestnut-fronted Macaw (Ara severus) peers from a nest cavity in South Miami. Canon EOS 40D, Canon 500mm lens + Canon 1.4x + 12mm extension + Sigma 1.4x. ISO 400, 1/160s at f/10.

We didn’t find anything spectacular at Matheson Hammock, but it was a pleasant morning nonetheless. And I got a chance to test the limits of my photographic equipment, which is always interesting. A few weeks earlier, I had noticed a nest hole high in a royal palm tree (probably an abandoned Pileated Woodpecker nest cavity) that was being frequented by Chestnut-fronted Macaws. These large parrots are native to Amazonia but established in Miami. With my Canon EOS 40D, 500mm lens, and 1.4x teleconverter, I just wasn’t getting enough magnification to create the image I wanted. So I looked in my camera bag and found that I had another 1.4x teleconverter (a Sigma). In order to mount the Sigma teleconverter between the Canon teleconverter and the camera body, I needed to add a 12mm extension tube between the two teleconverters. The resulting rig was unwieldy, but I was optimistic that I’d come away with some usable images nonetheless.

A 100 percent crop of the image above

You can see the image I captured above, and I’ve also included a 100% crop (i.e. when you click on the image, 1 pixel in your browser window equals 1 pixel in the camera) so you can see how much detail this ridiculous setup actually captured. Sure, pixel-for-pixel, it’s not quite as sharp as the 500mm lens alone, or even the lens coupled to a single teleconverter. But the image is quite usable, and it’s a photo that I wouldn’t have gotten without trying this combination of equipment.

Invasive? Exotic? What's the difference?

Posted by Neil Losin at 2:50 pm on May 28, 2010
May 282010

The introduction and proliferation of species outside their historical ranges is recognized as a major threat to biological diversity. The problem of “invasive species” has become well known outside the scientific community, although many people are hard-pressed to identify even the most conspicuous invasive species in their area. For example, most people I talk to while I’m doing my research here in South Florida are surprised to learn that the brown anole (Anolis sagrei) – easily the most common lizard in developed areas of Florida – isn’t native here, but an invasive species from Cuba.

The invasive brown anole (Anolis sagrei). This male has been marked with a white paint pen for my research

But not every species that arrives in a new habitat is “invasive,” and a plethora of terms are used, often casually, to describe species living outside their native range. All of these terms, and the imprecision with which they are often used, can confuse scientists and non-scientists alike. Here are a few of the most common: invasive, exotic, non-native, non-indigenous, introduced, established, and naturalized. And let’s not even get into the more emotionally loaded terms like “weedy,” “nuisance,” and “noxious.” What is the scientific consensus on these terms? Well, it turns out that the scientific community hasn’t quite settled on good definitions for all of them, but I’ll do my best to make some basic distinctions between them.

Exotic, non-native, and non-indigenous refer to species occurring outside their historical ranges. These terms don’t necessarily imply that these species have self-sustaining populations in their new range, only that they occur there. Introduced has a similar meaning, but with the added connotation of an anthropogenic (human-caused) colonization event. Established and naturalized describe species that have reached stable, sustainable population sizes in their new range – these species don’t require periodic or continuous replenishment to perpetuate themselves.

A male green anole (Anolis carolinensis), native to South Florida, displays its pink dewlap.

Invasive is the trickiest term. Some use it interchangeably with “exotic,” but this definition is too broad. Most scientists agree that the term invasive should be reserved for those species that have become established not only in human-altered habitats (like urban and suburban environments), but also in less disturbed natural habitats. Some authors also require that to be invasive, a species must have some negative effect on natural habitats. Most non-native species, however, have not been studied well enough to determine whether they have negative impacts on native plants and animals.

In South Florida, exotic and invasive species are everywhere. The brown anole that I study is certainly an invasive by any definition – since becoming established in peninsular Florida in the 1940s, it has spread throughout the state and beyond, it occurs in most habitats, and it competes with the native green anole (A. carolinensis), which seems to be suffering from the interaction.

A pair of red-masked parakeets (Aratinga erythrogenys) at the entrance to their nest hole. This species, while established in South Florida, is not 'invasive' in the strict sense.

On the other hand, there are many South Florida exotics that don’t seem to be invasive yet, and may never be. Last week I photographed a beautiful pair of red-masked parakeets (Aratinga erythrogenys) at a nest hole in South Miami. These parrots are native to Ecuador and Peru, and almost certainly arrived in Miami through the pet trade. They have been established in Miami since the early 1980s, and their populations seem to be self-sustaining if not growing. Their distribution is limited to suburban areas, however, where they often visit fruit trees and bird feeders for sustenance. They have not spread into undisturbed habitats, and they don’t seem to be a threat to native species (although they may compete for nest holes with native cavity-nesting birds). So we could call them a “non-invasive exotic.”

It’s important, I think, to recognize that not all non-native species are invasive. Unfortunately, however, we just don’t know enough about most exotics to classify them as “invasive,” “potentially invasive,” or “non-invasive.” Since most of these species initially become established in human-dominated areas, non-scientists have an important role to play in monitoring the arrival and spread of new species, as well as the interactions between these new arrivals and native species.

International League of Conservation Writers

Posted by Neil Losin at 8:37 pm on April 21, 2010
Apr 212010

A couple of weeks ago, I was selected to be an Associate Member of the International League of Conservation Writers (iLCW). When the iLCW’s formation was announced late last year, it sounded like the kind of organization that I’d like to be involved with, so I applied for membership. In this blog, as many of you have noticed, I tend to emphasize the power of visual media to communicate scientific and environmental concepts. But even the best images are impotent without a narrative – the impact of lone images is, at best, ephemeral and diffuse without a compelling story to bind them together. That’s why I’m glad to join the ranks of the iLCW. I’m honored to have a place among such great writers, and I’m eager to learn from them in my ongoing exploration of “science storytelling.” There’s not much on the iLCW website yet, but check out their blog to read profiles of their Founding Fellows.

© 2012 Day's Edge Blog Suffusion theme by Sayontan Sinha